2001 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2001 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 260 kg more than 2001 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 2001 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jaguar X-Type | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | X-Type | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |
