2001 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1972 Pontiac Ventura

To start off, 2001 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Pontiac Ventura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Pontiac Ventura would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Pontiac Ventura is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2001 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Pontiac Ventura. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Jaguar X-Type has automatic transmission and 1972 Pontiac Ventura has manual transmission. 1972 Pontiac Ventura will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Jaguar X-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Jaguar X-Type 1972 Pontiac Ventura
Make Jaguar Pontiac
Model X-Type Ventura
Year Released 2001 1972
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2967 cc 5735 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 231 HP 0 HP
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]