2001 Jaguar XJ vs. 1998 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1998 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1998 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2001 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Oldsmobile SS (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jaguar XJ. (317 Nm @ 4350 RPM). This means 1998 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jaguar XJ | 1998 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XJ | SS |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3248 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6350 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 317 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1900 mm |