2001 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (1,077 Nm) has 787 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Jaguar XJ220 1952 Jaguar XK
Make Jaguar Jaguar
Model XJ220 XK
Year Released 2001 1952
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3492 cc 3441 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 390 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 1077 Nm 290 Nm
Top Speed 354 km/hour 201 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1710 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 4940 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 2230 mm 1570 mm
Vehicle Height 1160 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2600 mm