2001 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1963 Simca 1300
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP) has 339 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1300. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1963 Simca 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (1,077 Nm) has 975 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1300. (102 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | 1963 Simca 1300 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Simca |
| Model | XJ220 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3492 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 1077 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2230 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2530 mm |
