2001 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1982 Maserati Merak
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1982 Maserati Merak. (158 HP @ 7100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1982 Maserati Merak. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1982 Maserati Merak. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | 1982 Maserati Merak | |
| Make | Jaguar | Maserati |
| Model | XJ220 | Merak |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3492 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2230 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2610 mm |
