2001 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Proton |
| Model | XJ220 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3492 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2230 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2450 mm |
