2001 Jaguar XJ220 vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 408. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Because 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (1,077 Nm) has 930 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 408. (147 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Peugeot |
| Model | XJ220 | 408 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3492 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 1077 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2230 mm | 1815 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2710 mm |
