2001 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover. (311 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jaguar XJR. (525 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jaguar XJR.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
Model | XJR | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 700 Nm |
Top Speed | 252 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2891 mm |