2001 Jaguar XK8 vs. 1970 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XK8 (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1970 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1970 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XK8 weights approximately 970 kg more than 1970 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XK8 (542 Nm) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jaguar XK8 | 1970 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Jaguar | ZAZ |
Model | XK8 | 966 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 542 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2170 mm |