2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 786 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Cedric |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2540 mm |