2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500
To start off, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | Mum 500 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 500 cc |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
