2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1997 Lada 110
To start off, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lada 110 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 236 kg more than 1997 Lada 110.
Because 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Lada 110. (266 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Lada 110. 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1997 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 1997 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1997 Lada 110 | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | Grand Cherokee | 110 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 266 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1480 kg |