2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2004 Suzuki XL7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 91 kg more than 2004 Suzuki XL7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Grand Cherokee | XL7 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.7 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 64 L |