2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1962 Mercedes-Benz W 110
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz W 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz W 110 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Mercedes-Benz W 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mercedes-Benz W 110. (142 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mercedes-Benz W 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jeep Wrangler | 1962 Mercedes-Benz W 110 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Wrangler | W 110 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |
