2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Wrangler | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2210 mm |