2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 3,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (301 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Wrangler | 1978 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1978 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3969 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2320 mm |