2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura CL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. 2002 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 2001 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Jeep | Acura |
Model | Wrangler | CL |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 315 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2580 mm |