2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (200 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Wrangler | Clio |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |
