2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2004 Toyota MR2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Toyota MR2. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota MR2.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (301 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota MR2. (170 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Wrangler | MR2 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3969 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |