2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (301 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Wrangler | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3969 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 239 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 382 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2900 mm |