2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Jeep | Tata |
Model | Wrangler | Nano |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 48 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 73.5 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2230 mm |