2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 2001 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Wrangler | Equator |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3560 mm |