2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 230 more horse power than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (301 Nm). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. 2012 Audi R8 has automatic transmission and 2001 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi R8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Jeep | Audi |
| Model | Wrangler | R8 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3969 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 420 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2649 mm |
