2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,969 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (301 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Wrangler | Clio |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3969 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |
