2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2001 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Jeep | Jeep |
Model | Wrangler | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2916 mm |