2001 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Nissan Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Wrangler | Z |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4246 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1326 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2550 mm |
