2001 Kia Retona vs. 1992 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2001 Kia Retona is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Kia Retona weights approximately 250 kg more than 1992 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2001 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Kia Retona | 1992 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Kia | Mercury |
| Model | Retona | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
