2001 Kia Rio vs. 1964 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2001 Kia Rio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,342 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Kia Rio (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Wartburg 312 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2001 Kia Rio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Kia Rio (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2001 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Kia Rio | 1964 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Kia | Wartburg |
Model | Rio | 312 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1342 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2460 mm |