2001 Kia Shuma vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2001 Kia Shuma. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2001 Kia Shuma.
Because 2009 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Kia Shuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Kia Shuma. (145 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Kia Shuma | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | Shuma | Colorado |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |