2001 Kia Visto vs. 1996 Pininfarina Eta
To start off, 2001 Kia Visto is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Pininfarina Eta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Pininfarina Eta would be higher. At 1,108 cc, 1996 Pininfarina Eta is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Pininfarina Eta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Pininfarina Eta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Kia Visto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Pininfarina Eta has automatic transmission and 2001 Kia Visto has manual transmission. 2001 Kia Visto will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Pininfarina Eta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Kia Visto | 1996 Pininfarina Eta | |
| Make | Kia | Pininfarina |
| Model | Visto | Eta |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
