2001 Lada Niva vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2001 Lada Niva is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2001 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lada Niva weights approximately 110 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2001 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Niva. (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lada Niva | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 55 L |