2001 Lada Roadster vs. 1963 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 2001 Lada Roadster is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 1,497 cc, 2001 Lada Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lada Roadster (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster should accelerate faster than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Because 1963 ZAZ Jalta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 ZAZ Jalta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lada Roadster (116 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm). This means 2001 Lada Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lada Roadster | 1963 ZAZ Jalta | |
| Make | Lada | ZAZ |
| Model | Roadster | Jalta |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 887 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2030 mm |
