2001 Lada Roadster vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 Lada Roadster is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lada Roadster | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lada | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Roadster | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 3790 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |
