2001 Lada Roadster vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 2001 Lada Roadster is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Because 1982 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 132 (142 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 1982 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster. 2001 Lada Roadster has automatic transmission and 1982 Zastava 132 has manual transmission. 1982 Zastava 132 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lada Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lada Roadster | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Lada | Zastava |
Model | Roadster | 132 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1756 cc |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2560 mm |