2001 Lada Roadster vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2001 Lada Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 1992 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lada Roadster | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Lada | Plymouth |
Model | Roadster | Colt |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1834 cc |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2530 mm |