2001 Lada Roadster vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lada Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lada Roadster would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lada Roadster | 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Lada | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Roadster | CLK |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 4966 cc |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 116 Nm | 460 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2720 mm |