2001 Lada Roadster vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lada Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lada Roadster would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Because 2010 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lada Roadster | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Lada | Cadillac |
| Model | Roadster | STS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 368 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2957 mm |
