2001 Lada Roadster vs. 2010 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2010 Honda CR-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lada Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lada Roadster would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda CR-V (180 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Roadster. (116 Nm). This means 2010 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lada Roadster | 2010 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Lada | Honda |
| Model | Roadster | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2619 mm |
