2001 Lada Samara II vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2001 Lada Samara II is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Lada Samara II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lada Samara II weights approximately 260 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lada Samara II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lada Samara II | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | Samara II | Minica |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2350 mm |