2001 Lada Samara II vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2001 Lada Samara II. (67 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Samara II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lada Samara II weights approximately 26 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lada Samara II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (280 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lada Samara II. (110 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lada Samara II.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lada Samara II | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Lada | Toyota |
Model | Samara II | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2982 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 944 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2670 mm |