2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 70 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Lancia | Studebaker |
Model | Nea | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2001 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2779 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2980 mm |