2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1965 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1965 Toyota Corona. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1965 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 425 kg more than 1965 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Corona. (115 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1965 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Nea | Corona |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1490 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 115 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2420 mm |