2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1969 Toyota Century
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Toyota Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Toyota Century would be higher. At 2,981 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Toyota Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1969 Toyota Century. (127 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1969 Toyota Century. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Toyota Century weights approximately 334 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 1969 Toyota Century is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Toyota Century. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Toyota Century. (236 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Toyota Century.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1969 Toyota Century | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Nea | Century |
Year Released | 2001 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2981 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 236 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1704 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2870 mm |