2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (170 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Nea | 140 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2127 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2620 mm |