2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1976 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mercury Cougar (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 660 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mercury Cougar (377 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 1976 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1976 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Lancia | Mercury |
Model | Nea | Cougar |
Year Released | 2001 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 5766 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 377 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2030 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2910 mm |