2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1981 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1981 Lincoln Continental. (129 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1981 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 485 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Because 1981 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Lincoln Continental. (313 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1981 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Lancia | Lincoln |
Model | Nea | Continental |
Year Released | 2001 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 4942 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 313 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1855 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2990 mm |