2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1982 Austin Ambassador
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 165 kg more than 1982 Austin Ambassador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (131 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Lancia Nea | 1982 Austin Ambassador | |
| Make | Lancia | Austin |
| Model | Nea | Ambassador |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1698 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1205 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2680 mm |
