2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1984 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 2,445 cc, 2001 Lancia Nea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1984 Toyota Cressida. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1984 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 200 kg more than 1984 Toyota Cressida. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Toyota Cressida. (162 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1984 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Nea | Cressida |
Year Released | 2001 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 1972 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1170 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2650 mm |