2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz S would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz S (175 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 590 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercedes-Benz S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercedes-Benz S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mercedes-Benz S (330 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 1996 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1996 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Lancia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Nea | S |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 2996 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1960 kg |